| Toronto, Ontario Lawyers, Legislation |
Child and Family Services Act , section: 57
Family Law, Order where child in need of protection
Where the court finds that a child is in need of protection and is satisfied that intervention through a court order is necessary to protect the child in the future, the court shall make one of the following orders or an order under section 57.1, in the child’s best interests:
1. That the child be placed in the care and custody of a parent or another person, subject to the supervision of the society, for a specified period of at least three months and not more than 12 months.
2. That the child be made a ward of the society and be placed in its care and custody for a specified period not exceeding twelve months.
3. That the child be made a ward of the Crown, until the wardship is terminated under section 65.2 or expires under subsection 71 (1), and be placed in the care of the society.
Consecutive orders of society wardship and supervision
4. That the child be made a ward of the society under paragraph 2 for a specified period and then be returned to a parent or another person under paragraph 1, for a period or periods not exceeding an aggregate of twelve months. R.S.O. 1990, c. C.11, s. 57 (1); 2006, c. 5, s. 13 (1-3).
(2) In determining which order to make under subsection (1) or section 57.1, the court shall ask the parties what efforts the society or another agency or person has made to assist the child before intervention under this Part. 2006, c. 5, s. 13 (4).
(3)The court shall not make an order removing the child from the care of the person who had charge of him or her immediately before intervention under this Part unless the court is satisfied that alternatives that are less disruptive to the child, including non-residential services and the assistance referred to in subsection (2), would be inadequate to protect the child. 1999, c. 2, s. 15 (1).
Community placement to be considered
(4)Where the court decides that it is necessary to remove the child from the care of the person who had charge of him or her immediately before intervention under this Part, the court shall, before making an order for society or Crown wardship under paragraph 2 or 3 of subsection (1), consider whether it is possible to place the child with a relative, neighbour or other member of the child’s community or extended family under paragraph 1 of subsection (1) with the consent of the relative or other person. R.S.O. 1990, c. C.11, s. 57 (4).
(5)Where the child referred to in subsection (4) is an Indian or a native person, unless there is a substantial reason for placing the child elsewhere, the court shall place the child with,
(a) a member of the child’s extended family;
(b) a member of the child’s band or native community; or
(c) another Indian or native family. R.S.O. 1990, c. C.11, s. 57 (5).
(6) Repealed: 1999, c. 2, s. 15 (2).
(7)When the court has dispensed with notice to a person under subsection 39 (7), the court shall not make an order for Crown wardship under paragraph 3 of subsection (1), or an order for society wardship under paragraph 2 of subsection (1) for a period exceeding thirty days, until a further hearing under subsection 47 (1) has been held upon notice to that person. R.S.O. 1990, c. C.11, s. 57 (7).
Terms and conditions of supervision order
(8) If the court makes a supervision order under paragraph 1 of subsection (1), the court may impose,
(a) reasonable terms and conditions relating to the child’s care and supervision;
(b) reasonable terms and conditions on,
(i) the child’s parent,
(ii) the person who will have care and custody of the child under the order,
(iii) the child, and
(iv) any other person, other than a foster parent, who is putting forward or would participate in a plan for the care and custody of or access to the child; and
(c) reasonable terms and conditions on the society that will supervise the placement, but shall not require the society to provide financial assistance or purchase any goods or services. 2006, c. 5, s. 13 (5).
Where no court order necessary
(9) Where the court finds that a child is in need of protection but is not satisfied that a court order is necessary to protect the child in the future, the court shall order that the child remain with or be returned to the person who had charge of the child immediately before intervention under this Part. R.S.O. 1990, c. C.11, s. 57 (9).
Note: Despite the proclamation of the Statutes of Ontario, 1999, chapter 2, section 15, section 57 of this Act, as it read before March 31, 2000, continues to apply with respect to any proceeding under Part III, including a status review proceeding, that was commenced before March 31, 2000. See: 1999, c. 2, ss. 37 (5), 38.
57.1 (1) Subject to subsection (6), if a court finds that an order under this section instead of an order under subsection 57 (1) would be in a child’s best interests, the court may make an order granting custody of the child to one or more persons, other than a foster parent of the child, with the consent of the person or persons. 2006, c. 5, s. 14.
Deemed to be order under Children’s Law Reform Act
(2) An order made under subsection (1) and any access order under section 58 that is made at the same time as the order under subsection (1) shall be deemed to be made under section 28 of the Children’s Law Reform Act and the court,
(a) may make any order under subsection (1) that the court may make under section 28 of that Act; and
(b) may give any directions that it may give under section 34 of that Act. 2006, c. 5, s. 14.
Order restraining harassment
(3) When making an order under subsection (1), the court may, without a separate application under section 35 of the Children’s Law Reform Act,
(a) make an order restraining any person from molesting, annoying or harassing the child or a person to whom custody of the child has been granted; and
(b) require the person against whom the order is made to enter into such recognizance or post such bond as the court considers appropriate. 2006, c. 5, s. 14.
(4) An order under subsection (3) is deemed to be a final order made under section 35 of the Children’s Law Reform Act and may be enforced, varied or terminated only in accordance with that Act. 2006, c. 5, s. 14.
Appeal under s. 69
(5) Despite subsections (2) and (4), an order under subsection (1) or (3) and any access order under section 58 that is made at the same time as an order under subsection (1) are orders under this Part for the purposes of appealing from the orders under section 69. 2006, c. 5, s. 14.
Conflict of laws (6) No order shall be made under this section if,
(a) an order granting custody of the child has been made under the Divorce Act (Canada); or
(b) in the case of an order that would be made by the Ontario Court of Justice, the order would conflict with an order made by a superior court. 2006, c. 5, s. 14.
Application of s. 57 (3)
(7) Subsection 57 (3) applies for the purposes of this section. 2006, c. 5, s. 14.
Effect of custody proceedings
57.2 If, under this Part, a proceeding is commenced or an order for the care, custody or supervision of a child is made, any proceeding respecting custody of or access to the same child under the Children’s Law Reform Act is stayed except by leave of the court in the proceeding under that Act. 2006, c. 5, s. 15.
This is not the official web site for the Ontario legislature or the Parliament of Canada.
The section data above may not be current. Please check statute at government site and consult with your own lawyer to ensure currency. Because this information comes from many sources who may be students and not lawyers or attorneys and because this site does NOT contain solicitor-to-client personalized advice it would be unsafe to apply this information to your particular set of facts. Do not rely upon this information. Consult a lawyer face-to-face.
Canada Statutes Ontario Statutes Edit
If you are a lawyer or a law student and you find an error or omission on this Family Law page, please notify Stephen R. Biss, Barrister & Solicitor, with a proper correction, addition, usable commentary, or cross-reference that we can add to this page and if we use it, we will create a free link to your Canadian law firm web site from this page. Stephen Biss does not normally practice Family Law, but there are many Toronto lawyers and other GTA Family Law lawyers who do. We maintain this database to stay current in areas of law where we do not normally practice.
Toronto lawyers, Toronto family law lawyers, other family law legislation
Toronto lawyers, Toronto wills law lawyers, other wills and estates law legislation
Toronto lawyers, Toronto business law lawyers, other business law legislation
Toronto lawyers, Toronto corporations law lawyers, other corporations law legislation
Toronto lawyers, Toronto civil litigation law lawyers, other litigation law legislation and rules
For more information respecting this database or to report misuse contact: Allbiss Lawdata Ltd., 303-470 Hensall Circle, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada, L5A 3V4. Allbiss Lawdata Ltd. is not a law firm. The author and the participants make no representation or warranty whatsoever as to the authenticity and reliability of the information contained herein. Advertisement. Any lawyers listed at this site do not practice in association. WARNING: All information contained herein is provided for the purpose of providing basic information only and should not be construed as formal legal advice. The authors disclaim any and all liability resulting from reliance upon such information. You are strongly encouraged to seek professional legal advice before relying upon any of the information contained herein. Legal advice should be sought directly from a properly retained lawyer or attorney.
Warning: This is NOT a government web site. The information provided herein has NOT been provided by a government. This information has been provided by a lawyer or attorney or student, for the purpose of providing basic information about the laws and regulations enacted by a government and the government offices that apply laws and regulations, and for the purpose of encouraging discussion and facilitating proper legal challenges related to the application of laws and regulations made by government. Citizens always have the right to challenge government. Citizens need independent information not provided by government about government offices, phone numbers, locations, and their services or lack thereof. Please note that the information provided may not be up to date. It is your responsibility to meet with a lawyer or attorney in person to get complete advice. Information provided by some government sites may also be sometimes out of date, sometimes incomplete, or sometimes focused on protection of government politicians, officers, policy initiatives, and interests. It is essential that you retain and instruct an independent lawyer or attorney to represent YOUR interests and inform you accordingly.